Seuk Kim |
As with anything else, there are pros and cons of
participating in interviews through Skype. Some of the pros are obvious. Cost
and time savings. Familiar environment. Control over certain variables. There
are many things you can point out to why it makes a lot of sense.
Some of the pitfalls or cons are not as obvious. Because
these interviews are often conducted at the homes or offices of the
interviewee, they may not apply the same rules as they would when being
interviewed by the media in a studio setting.
On The Wall Street Journal’s website today, I saw and clicked on a link to
a little blurb about Asian-Americans which I
found to be of interest.
I mean no disrespect to Mr. Siegel, who is an accomplished writer and critic having won a number of awards for
his work, but I just couldn’t take him very seriously in this interview. The
content is great IF you can get past the messy room, his child playing in the
background (I can sympathize with three kids at home ranging in ages 1-4) and
his eyes constantly looking off into the corner, but that is a big if. I’m
willing to bet that a big portion of the watching audience will notice all or
most of those things, which are quite a distraction. Those things are what most
people watching this interview will remember, rather than the content.
In stark contrast, Mr. Siegel was interviewed by Jon Stewart of The Daily Show back in 2008. He was entertaining, engaging and vibrant and provided a lot
of information which the audience (including myself) really connected with.
If you are ever in the position to be interviewed by the
media via Skype, please treat it as you would if you were being called to the
studio for a live interview at a studio. If the room or office is messy, please
take a moment to tidy up. There should be no distractions for the time when you
are “on-air”. Groom if needed. Dress appropriately. Look directly into the
webcam as you would into a studio camera. And most importantly, use common
sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment